--- url: /tinidrop-alternative title: TiniDrop Alternative for Internal HTML priority: P2 keyword: tinidrop alternative secondary_keywords: tinidrop vs display.dev, document sharing read tracking alternative, share html internally not pdf, static hosting company auth alternative funnel_stage: Decision schema: FAQPage, SoftwareApplication hero_style: routes hero_eyebrow: The TiniDrop alternative for work that faces inward hero_routes: fileLabel: Route 02 – drop the file fileHeading: Publish the page, not a document. fileBody: One HTML or Markdown file. Anonymous publishing takes up to 50 MB. It stays interactive – charts, filters and scripts all keep working. dropHeadline: Drop your .html file here dropSub: or choose a file foot: Either route returns a URL and a claim link. Claim it and the page sits behind your company's sign-in instead of an emailed link. hero_rotator: prefix: - Everything you send with TiniDrop, - without the words: - flattened PDF. - emailed link. - sales framing. - one-off upload. suffix: "" section_layouts: Outbound documents and internal pages are different jobs: problem Who can open it: access description: "TiniDrop tracks who reads the proposals and decks you send out. display.dev publishes interactive HTML inward, behind your company's Google or Microsoft sign-in." --- # Everything you send with TiniDrop, without the flattened PDF. TiniDrop is built for documents going outward: pitch decks, proposals, contracts, NDAs, with read tracking so you know what a prospect opened and when. display.dev is built for the other direction. Interactive HTML that your own team, your client or your execs open behind a sign-in they already have – and that your agent can republish at the same URL. [Try display.dev free →](https://app.display.dev) · [See pricing](/pricing) --- ## What TiniDrop does now Its hero reads "Send proposals. Track every read. Close faster.", over a picker for pitch decks, proposals, contracts and fundraising decks, and a drag-and-drop area for files or folders. It also hosts static sites, which is how it turns up in searches next to the drop-a-file hosts. On Solo and Pro it has a REST API that uploads files, replaces one in place at the same URL, and registers webhooks. If your job is a sales document and the question is whether the buyer read page seven, that is a good product and this is a short page for you. Facts about TiniDrop are from `tinidrop.com`, captured 10 August 2026. --- ## display.dev vs. TiniDrop | | display.dev | TiniDrop | | -------------------------------------- | ----------------- | -------------------------------- | | Interactive HTML stays interactive | ✅ | Document viewer | | PDF and deck read-tracking | ❌ | ✅ | | Restrict to named email addresses | ✅ | ✅ (per link) | | Google + Microsoft SSO for viewers | ✅ (Pro) | ❌ | | Publish with no account | ✅ | ❌ | | Publish from an agent | ✅ (CLI, API, MCP) | REST API (Solo and Pro) | | Inline comments an agent can read back | ✅ | ❌ | | Update in place at the same URL | ✅ | ✅ (API or dashboard, paid tiers) | | Page-by-page reading analytics | ❌ | ✅ | --- ## When TiniDrop is the right tool **A deck going to an investor.** Read tracking on a fundraising deck is a real sales signal and we do not produce it. **A contract or an NDA.** Documents that need to arrive as documents, with a record of who opened them. **Selling outward.** Anything where the reader is a prospect rather than a colleague. Their whole product is shaped around that reader, and ours is not. --- ## Outbound documents and internal pages are different jobs The moment the artifact is an interactive HTML report rather than a PDF, a document tool starts fighting the content. - **Interactivity does not survive a document viewer** – A dashboard's filters and charts become a picture of a dashboard. - **Per-link access does not scale inward** – Fine for six prospects, tedious for a whole engineering org. - **No company identity** – "Anyone at `@acme.com`" is not a link setting. --- ## Who can open it **Anyone with the link.** An open URL, served with noindex, when the content is genuinely public. **Invited people.** Named email addresses only, each with a one-time password by email. Per person, and removable per person. **Everyone at your company.** On Pro, Google Workspace or Microsoft Entra ID decides who gets in, and offboarding closes the page automatically. **And the loop closes.** Colleagues leave inline comments, your agent reads them back over MCP, publishes a new version at the same URL, and resolves the thread. --- ## Pricing **Free** – €0. 10 gated artifacts, unlimited public links, one-time password auth, unlimited viewers. **Solo** – €15/mo. Unlimited gated artifacts, 1GB storage, version history. **Pro** – €49/mo. Google + Microsoft SSO, private artifacts, 25GB, audit logs, unlimited viewers. **Enterprise** – from €499/mo. SAML, custom domain, RBAC, 365-day audit, DPA + SLA. [See all pricing →](/pricing) --- ## Try display.dev free - **Interactive HTML, not a flattened document** - Company sign-in instead of one link per reader - First artifact in 15 seconds · No credit card [Publish your first artifact free →](https://app.display.dev) · [See all pricing](/pricing) --- ## FAQ **Does display.dev track who read my document?** On gated artifacts you get a viewer list: people sign in, so each view has a name against it. What you do not get is page-by-page reading analytics on a PDF, which is TiniDrop's speciality. **Can I publish a PDF?** No. display.dev publishes HTML and Markdown. Ask your agent for a self-contained HTML version and it keeps the interactivity a PDF would flatten. **Which one should I use for a client report?** If the client reads it once and you want to know whether they finished it, TiniDrop. If they will come back to it, comment on it, and you will update it, display.dev – the URL stays the same across versions. **Do viewers need an account?** No. They sign in with the Google or Microsoft account they already use, or receive a one-time password by email. Nothing to install, nothing to create. **Can my agent publish it?** Yes – one CLI command, one API call, or an MCP tool call from Cursor, Codex, Claude Code or any other agent.